01.11.06

Seeing Zebras

Posted in Provider's paradigm at 7:28 pm by anne

Medscape has a medical student blog.    I like it a lot, actually, what little of it there is.   I especially liked this post from a medical student who was diagnosed with “Medicalstudentitis,”  or seeing the worst when the symptoms warranted only the obvious.   “When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras,” the student reminds his colleagues.

01.10.06

Posted in Provider's paradigm at 12:28 am by anne

Do you follow –even occasionally — the discussions on nursing bulletin boards?  I don’t, as a rule, but did today.   As a rule I’m impressed with the kindness, flexibility and knowledge that most posters show.   But today I came across some posts that sound like they could have been posted by 90% of the L&D nurses I know in Birmingham, Alabama, the backwater of evidence based maternity care,  I thought I would share this amalgamation of posts with you.
————————————–
They are right, though– they do not understand why women go to the HOSPITAL for birth and refuse medical care, like EFM, anesthesia, etc.    Those mothers who want to try normal birth but for whatever reason don’t finish with one are ‘failed,’ which in my estimation is a poor attitude toward those, her clients, she is to advocate for.
I suppose that “natural” appendectomies would be performed as they were in the old days: with six strong Bohemians holding the patient down while a barber cut without anesthetic. I guess the old trepining procedure (cutting a glabelar triangular hole in the skull with a rock to let out evil spirits) is natural, too.
For those who want that “natural” experience, more power to them. But, please, stay at home and have the baby. Why come to the hospital? And if you do, expect the full-court press to protect you and yours. Why? BECAUSE YOU’LL SUE EVERYONE if we don’t.
That’s just it. There’s nothing “natural” about being in a hospital. But, if you go to one, you should expect — and receive — medical care. I am NOT saying that every laboring mom should have an epidural/intrathecal. I AM saying that she should expect (1) fetal heart monitors and vital sign monitoring, (2) remaining NPO in case of an emergent c/s, (3) a c/s if her baby is showing lates or other NRFHT, (4) a spinal anesthetic for a c/s if she doesn’t already have an epidural, (5) a general anesthetic for a true crash and therefore no memory at all of the birth of her baby.  

Don’t give me this garbage about me being biased toward epidurals. Of course I recommend them. But, I can say with absolute certainty that I have NEVER snuck up on a patient and popped in an epidural. I DO tell women in initial interview (for medical hx, know who is on the floor, etc.) that they should NOT tell me ‘absolutely no to any epidural’ because I cannot in good conscience or legal right come back later when she’s in excruitiating pain saying, ‘give me that epidural.’ It’s now under duress.

I’m sure you do have plenty of moms who go “natural” and have “a beautiful birth.” More power to them. It doesn’t always happen that way and you know it. The more common is the scared primip screaming her head off ready to die or kill someone. Get real.

So, keep the bias AGAINST anesthesia to yourself. If you want to root for the mom to go natural, you better make sure she (1) plans to get pregnant, not ‘just happened, (2) goes to every prenatel class or laMaz or whatever for ‘visualization of no pain’, (3) was born with a naturally high pain tolerance and a tough attitude. When you can guarantee all that, then y’all can start being all high-and-mighty about so-called natural childbirth.

And, yes, if a mom is clamping down from the pain and not progressing, there is a small segment who will benefit from the relaxation provided by an epidural. Also, at the low concentrations of local anesthetic now commonly used, there is less numbness than there used to be. We expect them to feel the contraction, not the pain so much. And, we expect them to feel more at the end, through the less-well-covered sacral nerves.

Like I said, for a “normal, low risk pregnancy” mom can come to the hospital and decline an epidural. There is NO forcing them on ANYONE.

So keep your to yourself and get real.

Oh and believe me, nothing irritates me more than some failed homebirther walking in the door allready hating on the L&D staff, acting as if we are the enemy! Puhleeze….the very 1st thing I do is explain that the minute they sign their “consent for tx” forms and are officially admitted that I have certain legal obligations to fulfill and if they refuse any that such will be documented and placed in their medical record. As well as,of course, re-iterating that we are there to ensure the well being of themselves and their baby.
http://allnurses.com/forums/f35/natural-birth-112282-5.html
————–
Her paradigm appears to be  1. technology guarantees safety 2. Every patient is a potential litigant.  Proven efficacy or safety isn’t on the list. 
The changes propelled by consumers in the ’70s were largely cosmetic, when you think of it.   And we’ve gone backwards, actually, in the net effect.  (IOW we have wallpaper, awake moms and dads’ support but a 30% c-s rate)
While we’re at it, my 8-year old, who hasn’t even passed Epidemiology 101, can refute this (regarding the lamentable state of midwifery in Missouri)
“Given all of the advances in technology, our great physicians, great training and great hospitals, physicians should be delivering babies, and babies should be delivered in hospitals,” Harris said. “It is the safest and best practice.”